Climate Change Bill Brings a Bright Spot of Good News for Americans

We welcome any good news in a dismal news cycle, but the healthcare provisions built into the “Inflation Reduction Act” are worth a special mention.

The New York Times calls it “the most substantial changes to health policy since the passage of Obamacare in 2010.”

Passed by the U.S. Senate on August 8 and expected to pass in the House of Representatives on August 12, President Biden says he is looking forward to signing the bill into law. Here’s what we are looking forward to:

What seniors have needed for decades: giving Medicare the power to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies to reduce the astronomical costs charged for many drugs seniors need to stay alive and healthy.

The bill, beginning in 2025, sets a cap of $2,000 yearly for how much seniors pay for drugs. After reaching the cap, funds will come from the federal government, private insurers, and drug companies.

Federal subsidies for people who buy private health insurance through the Obama exchanges will be extended for three additional years, as they were during the coronavirus pandemic. For example, someone who pays about $80 in premiums will continue to pay that amount. These costs would double in 2023 without the bill.

Adult vaccines will be free starting in 2023 for seniors and people on Medicaid.

The bill uses federal subsidies to reduce the cost of health insurance and prescription drugs, insidious economic difficulties suffered by middle class and senior Americans.

Many benefits of this bill may not be evident to the people they help, as they are not visible directly. For instance, people won’t see large medical bills and may not be fully aware of free vaccines. But for the millions of Americans, particularly seniors, who struggle to pay for their prescription medications, the bill will be life-changing.

By design, the legislation will pay for itself and reduce the federal deficit over time while cutting prescription drug costs for the elderly and tightening enforcement on taxes for corporations and the wealthy.

It sounds like good news to us.

Chadwick Boseman

Lack of Estate Planning Turns a Private Life into Public News: Chadwick Boseman

Chadwick Boseman, the actor known for performances in “Black Panther” and “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom” was only 43 when he died. Despite knowing he was seriously ill from colon cancer, he did not have a will, so Boseman’s family was tasked with managing his estate in a public manner, the direct opposite of how he lived his life.

The estate had significant expenses and it wasn’t too hard for reporters to find the details because there was no will. Court documents obtained by several news sources reveal the estate was initially valued at $3.8 million before taxes, court fees and funeral expenses. The final amount to be divided between his widow and is parents is $2.5 million.

In October 2020, his widow Taylor Simone Ledward petitioned the court to make her an administrator with limited authority of his estate, and then filed a probate case in Los Angeles.

Chadwick did not have an estate plan with trusts that could have provided the family with privacy, reporters and others were able to access court papers to learn details like the exact amount and breakdown spent on his funeral, moneys used to purchase burial spaces for other family members and the court’s determination on several private matters.

You don’t have to be a celebrity for details of your life to be made public. All probate and administration proceedings are public records, and copies of these documents can be obtained by anyone who shows up at the court. Creditors, family members and anyone who wants to pry into the details of your life can obtain these documents. Having an estate plan with the methods and tools best suited for your estate can keep your life private and minimize estate expenses.

But another lesson from the passing of Chadwick Boseman is that families do have the ability—even celebrity families—to treat each other with kindness and respect. His widow asked the court to divide his estate evenly between herself and Boseman’s parents. Most families facing an estate without a will end up in court, battling for an inheritance. Sadly, this is the exception and not the rule with estates. Having an estate plan can prevent the likelihood of your family facing this situation.

 

Proposed Legislation “For the 99.5% Act” Takes Direct Aim at Estate Taxes

Last week, Senator Bernie Sanders (I, VT) and Senator Shelton Whitehouse (D, RI) introduced the “For the 99.5% Act,” which includes a reduction in the estate tax exemption to $3.5 million per individual and $7 million per couple.  Sanders also introduced a bill to raise the corporate tax to 35% and reduce a corporation’s ability to shelter offshore profits.

We have known for a while there will be changes coming to estate and corporate taxes. Many estate planning attorneys expect this act to become a foundation for the estate, gift, and GST provisions of the 2021 tax bill President Biden presented during his campaign. We do not know which changes Congress will pass, but we know that changes in whatever bill eventually passes will require estate plans to be adjusted.

The changes expected include larger estates being subject to higher tax rates. The proposal calls for the increase of the 40% estate tax rate to 45% for taxable estates less than $10 million, 50% for taxable estates over $10 million, and 65% for taxable estates greater than $1 billion.

The “95.9% Act” calls for eliminating many of the estate planning tools used for the last twenty years. This includes GRATS (Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts), step-up in basis, the grantor trust rules, and eliminating most minority interest discounts and many marketability discounts for passive assets.

The proposed legislation reduces the lifetime gift tax exemption and changes to the Generation Skipping Tax (GST) exemption and rules. It is also possible that Irrevocable life insurance trusts, which own the life insurance policy and shelters the proceeds from estate taxation, may be eliminated.

The expected changes to the estate tax laws may be finding more popular support following the release of a report showing that the top 1% of Americans are managing to not pay far more in income taxes than the IRS’s methods had assumed.

The report from researchers from the IRS, the London School of Economics, Carnegie Mellon University, and the University of California, Berkeley, shows the wealthiest 1% of households fail to report 21% of their actual income, and 6% of that stems from “sophisticated evasion” strategies missed by federal audits. The unreported income might be as much as twice as large as the IRS thought.

With declining enforcement staff, the IRA’s rates of audits have declined in the last ten years, when the top 1% of wealthy Americans have become even more skilled at underreporting income. This costs the federal government about $175 billion a year. For a government now seeking revenues to recoup the pandemic’s enormous costs, there is a call for re-investing in the IRS’s ability to go after tax avoiders.

According to The Wall Street Journal’s article, “High-Income Tax Avoidance Far Larger Than Thought, New Paper Estimates,” pass-through businesses and partnerships, offshore tax avoidance, and other sophisticated entities have made it harder for the IRS to uncover income.

An op-ed in The New York Times’ Sunday Review, “How to Collect Unpaid Taxes,” references an IRS report from 2019  that estimated “Billions of dollars in business profits, rent and royalties are hidden from the government each year. By contrast, more than 95 percent of wage income is reported.”

The government’s inability to enforce tax laws is a function of how the IRS has been shrinking over time, with fewer workers. But former IRS commissioner Charles Rossotti says that Congress needs to change the law and create a third-party verification for business income, just as there is a third-party verification for wages. Rossotti proposes that information be collected from banks, requiring them to produce annual account statements totaling income and outflow, similar to the 1099 forms that investment firms must provide to clients. The Times thinks this would increase the taxes paid by those not reporting income by scaring people into compliance. Expect the banking and securities lobbyists to push back against any new requirements.

As someone who has worked in complex tax law for several decades, I have seen how often the IRS and academics have engaged in hand-wringing over how unfair the tax laws are, depending on the times, to the wealthy or American wage earners. But for now, tax law permits these strategies, and it appears any plan in place before a new tax law is signed will be grandfathered in.

We are keeping a close watch on the pending legislation as it winds its way through various committees and will continue to keep you informed on how it may affect your estate plan.

References:

The Wall Street Journal (March 22, 2021) “High-Income Tax Avoidance Far Larger Than Thought, New Paper Estimates”

The New York Times (March 20, 2022) “How to Collect $1.4 Trillion in Unpaid Taxes”

 

What Are The Benefits Of Naming A Corporate Fiduciary?

Many individuals who establish trusts choose to name a close friend or relative as trustee.  However, there are many situations where naming a corporate fiduciary is a far better alternative.

Acting as a trustee requires that the person have a good background in finance and tax. Failing that, the liability of making poor financial decisions may be overly burdensome for someone selected primarily because of their relationship with you. Depending on the size of the estate, performing as a trustee may require more time and energy than the person is able to devote to the required duties.

Here’s another problem, and one that we see often. It is unfair to the beneficiaries of the trust to pay a trustee for services rendered if the trustee is not qualified to perform the services, or does not have the necessary credentials to manage the trust. Even if friends or family members are professionals in finance, law or tax, they may not necessarily have the right knowledge of estate tax. They may be capable and trustworthy without being qualified. Paying them if they are not qualified may lead to bad feelings between family members and/or friends.

Along those lines, naming a friend or relative may subject the individual to highly charged and emotional disputes. If they are a friend, they may not appreciate being thrust into a family argument, and if they are a family member, they may bring their own emotional baggage that may complicate even the simplest of arrangements.

An alternative is the corporate fiduciary, which will take on a more business-like approach to the tasks and responsibilities of managing a trust without becoming emotionally involved in any disputes among the beneficiaries. Naming a corporate fiduciary also adds permanence to the choice and ensures that individuals who are skilled in money management, taxes, and conservation of trust principal will administer the trust.

Selecting a bank or independent trustee does not preclude family participation in the trust decisions. A friend or family member might be named as a co-trustee, with power to make or participate in decisions regarding discretionary distributions to beneficiaries.

The best estate plan in the world can be undermined by poor trustee selection. This is a decision to discuss with advisors, including the family estate attorney, CPA, financial advisor, and other trusted professionals.

Congress Waives Required Minimum Distributions

The CARES Act ( the “Act”) waives the required minimum distribution rules for certain defined contribution plans and IRAs for calendar year 2020. This provision provides relief to individuals otherwise required to withdraw funds from such retirement accounts.

This also includes individuals who turned 70 1/2 in 2019 but elected to defer their initial distribution to April 1, 2020. If an individual has taken their RMD, they can redeposit it if sixty days have not elapsed since the date of the distribution.

Hardship IRA/401(k) Withdrawals

The Act will allow coronavirus related withdrawals from their 401(k) and IRA accounts up to $100,000 during 2020 and avoid the normal 10% penalty for those not of the required minimum age of 59.5.

Reasons for Coronavirus related withdrawals include

(1)    An account owner diagnosed with COVID-19, or

(2)    A spouse or dependent is diagnosed with COVID-19, oe

(3)    An individual who experiences adverse financial consequences because of being quarantined, furloughed, laid off, having work hours reduced, being unable to work due to lack of child care due to the coronavirus, or

(4)    closing or reducing hours of a business owned or operated by the individual due to coronavirus, or

(5)    or other factors as determined by the Treasury Secretary.

You are still required to pay income taxes but don’t have to pay the full amount in one year. You can spread that tax due over three years. Another option is to redeposit the withdrawn amounts back within three years.

Treatment of Charitable Deductions.

Generally, taxpayers must itemize their deductions to take advantage of charitable deductions. This itemized deduction requirement is eliminated for charitable deductions of up to $300 for most contributions for the 2020 tax year. Note that not all charitable deductions are eligible for this treatment. Specifically, charitable contributions made to a private foundation or donor-advised fund, are not eligible for the above-the-line charitable deduction.

In addition, the limitation that applies to the amount of a charitable deduction that can be claimed by individual taxpayers is based on a percentage of the individual taxpayer’s adjusted gross income is also eliminated for 2020.

Finally, a reminder – if you do not have a healthcare proxy in place, visit our website www.sjslawpc.com and fill in the contact form. We will send you a personalized healthcare proxy with directions. Print it out, insert a date, sign your name on the line indicated in front of two unrelated witnesses. Make sure that the document is readily available in an emergency. We can ONLY do this through the website.

If you have questions, please send them to sjs@sjslawpc.com.

Be safe,

Stephen J. Silverberg, Esq.